Its biggest mistakes where those
-The correlation is false, the bisexual and pseudobisexual groups are mixed in only one, thus spoiling many data
-It doesn't accept outlyers, when it is a prerequisite for any theory or model to be able to accept outlyers. For example, non-agp lesbians, and agp-hsts, for example, which were found to exist even in the earliest studies.
-The autogynephilia scale was poorly designed and doesn't follow any of the standard rules for psychological tests, thus being unreliable.>>8715459>Kay Brown disagrees with the AGPs have feminized brains pre HRT narrative. Is she right?
Kay Brown is an AGP in disguise who wants to fake being an HSTS for legitimacy. She's basically what americans call an "uncle tom".
She's been suspected to have had some lesbian relationships, one of which ended bad and unveiled all her bigotry.
More info herehttp://www.tsroadmap.com/info/transkids/candice-brown-elliott.html>>8716300>what about genital avoidance in certain hsts?
as I said: The devil is in the details
I've been suspecting for quite a while that transexual typology may be a bit more complex than just 2 groups
for example the HSTS may be further divided in 2, those with genital avoidance and those without
From my (anecdotal) experience, I've seen that those with genital avoidance tend to behave much more like cis women, while the ones with "genital acceptance", many times just seek the social experience of being a woman, while in bed they can be more bottoms but topping on ocasion, or otherwise using their genitalia for sexual purposes with their partners
It isn't very feminine to literally FAP or wishing to penetrate, right? Yet those girls usually get a "they're more feminine status" than many transbians that show feminine behaviors and hate their genitals and just want a vagina to be like any other cis lesbian would be, just because they like men. Don't do cis lesbians exist? Why can't a trans be lesbian?